District of Columbia· 3/13/1996
In Re Young
Citations
- 193 B.R. 620
- 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 260
- 1996 WL 135147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “... the stay is intended only to prohibit postpetition affirmative acts by creditors and thus acts as a freeze of the status quo at petition,”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Teel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- TranSouth Financial Corp. v. Sharon (In Re Sharon)Sixth Circuit· 1999-06-04· cited 129×
- Thompson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., LLCSeventh Circuit· 2009-05-27· cited 70×
- In Re SharonS.D. Ohio· 1996-07-30· cited 42×
- Trevino v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. (In re Trevino)S.D. Texas· 2015-07-31· cited 40×
- Gouveia v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States (In Re Quality Health Care)N.D. Indiana· 1997-07-28· cited 23×
- State of California Employment Development Department v. Taxel (In re Del Mission Ltd.)Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-23· cited 23×
- Joy Denby-Peterson v.Third Circuit· 2019-10-28· cited 22×
- Massey v. Chrysler Financial Corp. (In Re Massey)D. Maryland· 1997-07-08· cited 21×
- Unified People's Federal Credit Union v. Yates (In Re Yates)Tenth Circuit· 2005-09-29· cited 20×
- In Re FitchS.D. California· 1998-02-02· cited 18×
- Mitchell v. BankIllinoisS.D. Texas· 2004-07-28· cited 18×
- Harchar v. United States (In Re Harchar)N.D. Ohio· 2008-07-14· cited 16×
- Gordon Properties, LLC v. First Owners Ass'n (In Re Gordon Properties, LLC)E.D. Virginia· 2011-09-20· cited 15×
- Brown v. Town & Country Sales & Service, Inc. (In Re Brown)E.D. Virginia· 1999-06-22· cited 14×
- Metromedia Fiber Network Services v. Lexent, Inc. (In Re Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2003-02-13· cited 11×
- In Re PlutaD. Massachusetts· 1996-09-30· cited 11×
- In Re BernsteinDistrict of Columbia· 2000-09-20· cited 11×
- Turner v. DeKalb Bank (In Re Turner)N.D. Alabama· 1997-06-03· cited 11×
- Barringer v. Eab Leasing (In Re Barringer)E.D. Michigan· 1999-10-04· cited 11×
- In re StewartE.D. Michigan· 2013-09-20· cited 11×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court· 1980-06-23· cited 2,455×
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court· 1995-10-31· cited 594×
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 334×
- In Re John Rothwell Knaus, Debtor. John Rothwell Knaus v. Concordia Lumber Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1989-11-13· cited 184×
- Inslaw, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-01-13· cited 113×
- Emil v. HanleySupreme Court· 1943-03-15· cited 86×
- Abrams v. Southwest Leasing & Rental Inc. (In Re Abrams)Ninth Circuit· 1991-05-31· cited 74×
- In Re BriggsE.D. Michigan· 1992-07-29· cited 63×
- INSLAW, Inc. v. United States (In Re INSLAW, Inc.)District of Columbia· 1988-01-25· cited 63×
- Troy Industrial Catering Service v. State, Department of Treasury, Revenue Division (In Re Troy Industrial Catering Service)E.D. Michigan· 1980-01-18· cited 45×
- Najafi v. Cabrini College (In Re Najafi)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-05-13· cited 39×
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Kaplan in Re Waltham Watch CoFirst Circuit· 1951-01-08· cited 38×
- In Re RichardsonE.D. Texas· 1992-01-13· cited 34×
- In Re Harper-ElderDistrict of Columbia· 1995-07-27· cited 29×
- Carr v. Security Savings & Loan Ass'nD. New Jersey· 1991-08-08· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.