In re Yost
Citations
- 117 F. 792
- 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy—Fraudulent Conveyance—Exemption.</p> <p>A bankrupt, while in failing circumstances, disposed of all his valuable assets, receiving a judgment note for part of the consideration. A judgment was entered on the note a few days after it was given, and the judgment was transferred to another on the record. Thereafter the bankrupt made an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and then attempted to discount the judgment so previously assigned, stating to the attempted transferee that he was afraid the original transfer would not stand, and that, while the assignee of the judgment had paid over the money, it was withheld so that if the bankrupt’s creditors got hold of it it was to be refunded, otherwise the bankrupt was to have it. Held, that the original transfer of the judgment was fraudulent and void as to creditors of the bankrupt, and hence he was not entitled to his state exemption.</p>
Judges: Archbald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Githens v. ShifflerM.D. Pennsylvania· 1902-01-03· cited 22×
- Huey's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1857-07-01· cited 8×
- Miller v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1888-03-19· cited 8×
- Assigned Estate of KreiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-06-02· cited 6×
- Ferris v. IronsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1877-01-02· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.