· 8/28/1997
In Re Yellow Cab Co.
Citations
- 212 B.R. 154
- 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1409
- 31 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 494
- 1997 WL 555915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the elements of issue 28 ves preclusion under California and federal law are the same
- “[Privity] requires more than a showing of parallel interests' — it is not enough that the non-party may be interested in the same questions or proving the same facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.