Skip to main content
· 8/28/1997

In Re Yellow Cab Co.

Citations

  • 212 B.R. 154
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1409
  • 31 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 494
  • 1997 WL 555915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the elements of issue 28 ves preclusion under California and federal law are the same
  • “[Privity] requires more than a showing of parallel interests' — it is not enough that the non-party may be interested in the same questions or proving the same facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.