In re Yellow Brass Plumbing Component Products Liability Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that moving for a Rule 56(d) deferral does not eliminate a party’s obligation to submit a timely, compliant Statement of Disputed Facts
• finding that the requested discovery was insufficient to support a continuance “because it [wa]s not essential to [plaintiff’s] opposition to [defendant’s] summary judgment motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).