Skip to main content
· 9/6/2011

In Re Yamaha Motor Corp. Rhino ATV Products Liability Litigation

Citations

  • 816 F. Supp. 2d 442
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103538
  • 2011 WL 4072102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Concluding that an expert's \testimony could assist the jury by distilling disparate incident reports and analyzing how a large corporation such as Yamaha digests and processes such information.\
  • permitting expert testimony regarding “what Yamaha knew and when”
  • permitting expert testimony regarding “what Yamaha knew and when”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jennifer B. Coffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.