Skip to main content
· 12/28/1994

In Re Y & A Group Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 38 F.3d 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court had authority under the All Writs Act to enjoin arbitration to protect its earlier consent judgment where the arbitral panel had declined to afford that judgment preclusive effect
  • focusing on appeal in that case on court’s determination of likelihood of success on the merits
  • focusing on appeal in that case on court’s determination of likelihood of success on the merits
  • focusing on appeal in that case on court’s determination of likelihood of success on the merits
  • “The district court, and not the arbitration panel, is the best interpreter of its own judgment.”
  • “[N]o other forum provides an adequate substitute for a court’s action in protection of its own judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.