Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to the eleven factors that may be considered to determine fraudulent intent and are found in the AUFTA as “badges of fraud”
• identifying 11 factors “courts should look to” when “determining whether the circumstantial evidence supports an inference of fraudulent intent” and noting “the appropriate analysis of actual fraudulent intent under § 548(a) would look to the badges of fraud”
• identifying 11 factors “courts should look to” when “determining whether the circumstantial evidence supports an inference of fraudulent intent” and noting “the appropriate analysis of actual fraudulent intent under § 548(a) would look to the badges of fraud”
• consent judgment not entitled to preclusive effect “where [it] was obtained as part of a collusive scheme on the part of [the debtor and its transferee] to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors”
• Actual intent to defraud creditors is ordinarily established by circumstantial evidence typically gathered by a court’s consideration of certain badges of fraud.
• listing of 11 badges of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).