In Re Wulf's Estate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• more than forty witnesses to “common talk or general report in the neighborhood” and many others who testified about the father’s direct recognition (cleaned up)
• “It is generally held the recognition need not be ‘universal or so general and public as to have been known by all’; need not be continuous, ‘covering the whole period up to and including the time of the death of the putative father.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).