In re Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the special 6 master was in the best position to determine the witnesses’ credibility” and determining that his findings “do not appear to be unreasonable, given the testimony in this case”
• accepting review panel’s report and recommendation and imposing one-year 32 suspension with conditions for attorney’s violations of Rule 1.4, 1.5 (c) (2), 1.15 (I) (b) and (c), and 1.15 (II) (b
• one-year suspension for intentional violation of Rule 1.15 and other rules where client was harmed and lawyer engaged in dishonesty; reinstatement conditioned on repayment of client and other things
• one-year suspension for intentional violation of Rule 1.15 and other rules where client was harmed and lawyer engaged 20 in dishonesty; reinstatement conditioned on repayment of client and other things

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of Edward Shuff Cook
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-04-05· cited 31×
• In re Braziel
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-07-01· cited 3×
• In the Matter of Cheryl Joyce Braziel
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-07-01· cited 3×
• in the Matter of Murble Anita Wright
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-16
• In re Wright
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-16
• In the Matter of Walter Douglas Adams
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-11-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Davis
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-02-27· cited 13×
• In Re Smith Fitch
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-05-31· cited 12×
• In Re O'Brien-Carriman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-22· cited 8×