In Re Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the pleadings of pro se litigants are construed liberally, there is no lower standard when it comes to rules of evidence and procedure.” Powers v. Runyon, 974 F. Supp. 693, 696 (S.D. Ind. 1997)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harold Ex Rel. Estate of Harold v. McGann
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-12-29· cited 30×
• Woodstock Housing Corp. v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-12-23· cited 15×
• In Re Brill
  S.D. New York· 2004-12-16· cited 12×
• Zisholtz v. Anthony Charles Homes, Inc. (In Re Zisholtz)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-11-13· cited 7×
• Young v. PHEAA
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-09-30· cited 7×
• In Re Rushing
  M.D. Louisiana· 2010-03-03