In Re Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disclosure to the court is an absolute requirement of the bankruptcy process
• finding that full disclosure to the court is essential because it allows the court to craft the most equitable remedy, as well as to protect the integrity of the bankruptcy system
• sanctioning a law firm for failing to disclose an appearance attorney pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2016(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Enron Corp. Securities
  S.D. Texas· 2008-09-08· cited 66×
• Law Offices of Boone v. Derham-Burk (In Re Eliapo)
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-28· cited 28×
• In re Bradley
  S.D. Texas· 2013-07-16· cited 23×
• Messner v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. (In Re Smith)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-08-29· cited 20×
• In Re Jacobson
  W.D. Washington· 2009-03-10· cited 19×
• Michael J. Osbon v. Eric K. Shinseki
  Veterans Claims· 2010-04-23