Skip to main content
· 1/31/1995

Federal Case

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 813
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that when determining the nature of the impairment a court must also consider the extent to which the parties' reasonable contract expectations have been disrupted
  • finding contract between state workers' compensation agency and insurers based upon statute and other documents
  • considering “the extent to which the [parties’] reasonable contract expectations have been disrupted”
  • “In practical terms, state legislation violates the Contract Clause if: (1) the state law operates as a substantial impairment upon a contractual relationship, and (2) the state cannot demonstrate a significant and legitimate public purpose behind the regulation.”
  • “This right of court access cannot be impaired, either directly or indirectly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.