Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “bankruptcy courts have wide discretion in structuring the sales of estate assets”
• finding the appeal moot because the appellants failed to obtain a stay pending appeal and thus were barred from attempting to overturn the sale of the property from the bankruptcy estate
• finding, under FRBP 2002(a)(2), that amended sales terms providing 13 days’ notice instead of 21 days was adequate because “[t]he initial notice of sale . . . was served on all parties in interest” thus satisfying the statutory requirement
• failure of appellants to obtain stay pending appeal of property transferred to a bona fide third-party purchaser barred the appeal under § 363(m)
• where appellants failed to obtain a stay pending appeal and property had been transferred to a bona fide third party purchaser, 11 U.S.C. § 363(m) bars the attempt to overturn the § 363 sale on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).