In re Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a debtor’s motion to reopen where the debtor had no viable claim against a mortgage lender because the automatic stay had expired, and the discharge injunction did not bar foreclosure
• “In a chapter 7 case of an individual, the automatic stay continues only ‘until the time a discharge is granted or denied.’”
• discussing cause to reopen for equitable concerns
• discussing cause to reopen for equitable concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Everton Aloysius Sterling
  S.D. New York· 2015-12-22· cited 14×
• In re Gill
  W.D. New York· 2015-04-16· cited 13×
• Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of America N.A. (In re Pennington-Thurman)
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-10-21· cited 12×
• In re Killmer
  S.D. New York· 2013-11-15· cited 11×
• In re Oglesby
  N.D. Ohio· 2014-10-10· cited 10×
• In re Palumbo
  W.D. New York· 2016-09-01· cited 3×
• Wilma Pennington-Thurman v. Bank of America N.A.
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-10-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Bank of India v. Chalasani (In re Chalasani)
  Second Circuit· 1996-08-13· cited 97×
• In Re Emmerling
  Second Circuit· 1997-08-18· cited 53×
• In Re Cruz
  S.D. New York· 2000-06-21· cited 51×
• In re Easley-Brooks
  S.D. New York· 2013-02-25· cited 35×
• In Re Mayton
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-03-31· cited 30×
• In Re Otto
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2004-05-06· cited 28×
• Drew v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
  S.D. New York· 1995-07-26· cited 6×