In re Wilmot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the assignee of a limited partnership interest who had not been accepted as a substitute limited partner acquired only the assignor’s right to receive distributions and allocations of profits and losses from the partnership
• holding that the assignee of a limited partnership interest who had not been accepted as a substitute limited partner acquired only the assignor = s right to receive distributions and allocations of profits and losses from the partnership

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Schick
  S.D. New York· 1999-06-18· cited 5×
• Gregory A. Bird and Michael G. Radler v. Lubricants, USA, LP, Lubricants Management Group, LP, APL Management, LLC, Chris Haire, and Robert Blake Shaw
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2007-08-31

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sullivan v. International Fidelity Insurance
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-07-18· cited 41×
• Macklowe v. 42nd Street Development Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-02-26· cited 21×
• Spinex Laboratories, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-02-09· cited 6×
• In re the Estate of Stiassni
  New York Surrogate's Court· 1949-05-27· cited 4×