In re Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(3)(A) ] additionally confirms that state law will be used as it existed on the petition date.”
• In applying the similar federal exemption, holding that “[g]enerally, the petition date is the date at which a claim to exemption is determined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Depascale
  N.D. Ohio· 2013-08-08· cited 6×
• Sheehan v. Ash
  N.D. West Virginia· 2017-06-27· cited 4×
• Shell v. Yoon
  N.D. Indiana· 2013-09-24· cited 2×
• In re Minor
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2015-02-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. Schafer (In Re Schafer)
  Sixth Circuit· 2012-08-20· cited 26×
• In re Coenen
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2012-09-10· cited 10×
• In Re Erik R. Olsen
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2005-03-10· cited 7×
• In Re George
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2010-12-17· cited 5×
• Shell
  N.D. Indiana· 2012-08-14· cited 3×
• Pullman Group, LLC v. Gold Forever Music, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 3×
• In Re Whipple
  C.D. Illinois· 2009-09-21· cited 2×