District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/3/1998
In Re Willingham
Citations
- 717 A.2d 342
- 1998 WL 557104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suspending an attorney for sixty days for commingling and neglect of client matters
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wagner, Chief Judge, and Farrell and King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-31· cited 140×
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-07-16· cited 71×
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 58×
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-11-29· cited 48×
- In Re ChisholmDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-03· cited 26×
- In Re RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-05-18· cited 21×
- In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-29· cited 21×
- In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-10-19· cited 17×
- In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-24· cited 14×
- Matter of McGannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-10-23· cited 8×
- In Re JoynerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.