in Re Willie James Brumfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• focusing on policy language stating that all damages “as a result of bodily injury to any one person” were subject to single per-person limits, court held that father’s damages were suffered “as a result of’ bodily injury to his daughter, and thus subject to single limit
• “plaintiffs emotional distress claim ‘is a by-product of and entirely dependent upon the bodily injury to his daughter’ ” and therefore subject to “per person” limit. Also finding that “emotional distress is not a bodily injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).