In Re Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that neither the death of a client nor \an attorney's discharge by a client free him to represent adverse interests\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Estate of Ragen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-11-30· cited 63×
• People v. Spicer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-11· cited 40×
• Schmidt v. Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban and Fuller
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-08-14· cited 33×
• In Re Spencer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 17×
• Leckrone v. City of Salem
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-01-29· cited 16×
• Skorek v. Przybylo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-20· cited 12×
• In Re Estate of Lilly
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-08-31· cited 5×
• Lilly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-08-31· cited 1×
• Ray-Chuen Chang v. Ragen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-11-30· cited 1×
• GTE Government Systems Corp. v. Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster, P.C.
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 1996-04-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Gerold
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1914-12-16· cited 151×
• In Re Michal
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1953-05-20· cited 8×