In Re Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]wo purposes of criminal sanctions are to deter and to punish the wrongdoer” and that “[b]oth of these purposes are undermined when innocent creditors are required to help pay for a debtor’s criminal sanctions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: Wayne K. Crawford, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-04-01· cited 42×
• In re Osorio
  D. New Jersey· 2014-12-08· cited 8×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Bowles
  E.D. Virginia· 1985-04-04· cited 40×
• In Re Riggel
  S.D. Ohio· 1992-04-03· cited 24×
• In Re Tucker
  N.D. Ohio· 1992-07-16· cited 10×
• In Re Games
  E.D. Washington· 1997-10-10· cited 9×
• In Re Limbaugh
  D. Oregon· 1996-04-03· cited 9×
• In Re Veasley
  E.D. Arkansas· 1996-12-05· cited 8×
• In Re Brigance
  W.D. Tennessee· 1998-03-13· cited 6×
• In Re Ponce
  E.D. Washington· 1998-03-10· cited 5×
• In Re Rivera Echevarria
  D. Puerto Rico· 1991-06-10· cited 3×
• In Re Stanley
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-11-05· cited 2×