In Re Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as to a trustee’s fee application that “recovery will be allowed for extraordinary expenses to the extent they are associated with the special needs of an individual case and are fully documented[]”
• concrete and specific documentation of expenses is needed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re United States Trustee.
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-08-05· cited 32×
• In Re Stanley
  E.D. Texas· 1990-10-05· cited 22×
• Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In Re Specialty Plywood, Inc.)
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-11-10· cited 11×
• In Re Orient River Investments, Ltd.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-11-21· cited 11×
• In Re Larson
  E.D. Virginia· 2006-07-21· cited 10×
• In Re Metropolitan Environmental, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 2003-03-06· cited 10×
• In Re Vernon-Williams
  E.D. Virginia· 2006-04-27· cited 8×
• In Re Miguel
  E.D. California· 1991-01-25· cited 7×
• Sousa v. Miguel
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-08-05· cited 7×
• In Re Bryant
  E.D. Virginia· 2006-07-18· cited 4×
• In Re Jenkins
  S.D. California· 1994-08-25· cited 3×
• In Re Barker
  N.D. California· 1991-09-30· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In Re Orthopaedic Technology, Inc.
  D. Colorado· 1989-03-01· cited 49×