In Re Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an attorney may receive more than the presumptive fee if lodestar analysis is requested; bankruptcy court should not deny an attorney’s request to utilize the lodestar analysis to determine fees
• noting that \[a] growing number of bankruptcy courts\ have implemented these fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Brent
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-09-29· cited 61×
• In re Ulrich
  E.D. Michigan· 2014-09-05· cited 23×
• In Re Williams
  E.D. Michigan· 2007-12-04· cited 22×
• In Re Waldo
  E.D. Tennessee· 2009-10-27· cited 21×
• In Re Sharp
  E.D. Michigan· 2007-04-30· cited 7×
• In re Rogers
  W.D. Michigan· 2013-10-11· cited 6×
• In Re Becker
  M.D. Florida· 2012-04-03· cited 4×
• In Re Coy Farms, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 2009-09-25· cited 2×
• In re Beale
  E.D. Virginia· 2016-06-10· cited 2×
• In re Smith
  E.D. Michigan· 2015-09-14
• In re Pursley
  E.D. Tennessee· 2017-10-06