In Re: William W. Gothard, Jr. v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned a lease agreement with the government that was not covered by the CDA
• finding that a lease of land in which the Navy was lessor did not fall within the CDA’s provision governing the procurement of property, other than- real property in being, 41 U.S.C. § 7102(a)(1
• finding that a lease of land in which the Navy was lessor did not fall within the CDA’s provision governing the procurement of property, other than real property in being, 41 U.S.C. § 7102(a)(1
• affirming district court's grant of partial summary judgment and permanent injunction enjoining former lessees from remaining on property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).