in Re William M. Windsor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the circumstantial evidence presented insufficient to establish Henderson knew a gun would be used in the robbery
• explaining “foreseeability, as opposed to knowledge or intent is not enough to sustain aiding-and-abetting conviction”
• requiring proof that aider and abettor knew dangerous weapon would be used to prove first-degree robbery
• “Because the motion did not mention the deficiency in proof now raised on appeal, we find that error was not preserved.”
• “One good reason not to use a firearm is Iowa’s 17.5 year mandatory minimum prison term for first-degree robbery, one of the most severe in the country.” (citing Iowa Code § 902.12(5))
• “[K]nowledge can be proved by circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).