In re William L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the testimony of accomplices must be corroborated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Botka v. R. C.
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-06-19· cited 28×
• In re Albert B.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-03-02· cited 13×
• In re Tony W.
  New York Family Court· 1977-10-11· cited 8×
• In re Archer
  NYC Family Court· 1977-02-16· cited 4×
• In Re RC
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-06-19