in Re William Fishback

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff had proved ownership of land in § 52-560 claim
• affirming trial court’s conclusion as to location of boundary line where court adopted boundary line ‘‘that track[ed] the calls set out in [the] deed and [did] not ignore any of those calls’’
• plaintiff may collect only those damages specified by a statute, and no additional punitive damages or attorney's fees
• ‘‘[t]he land of an adjoining owner whose boundaries can be fixed by known monuments is also considered to be a monument to establish a boundary’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).