Skip to main content
· 8/9/1994

In Re William EISEN, Debtor. Richard MONEYMAKER, Appellant, v. Melvyn J. CoBEN, Appellee

Citations

  • 31 F.3d 1447
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1455
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 11105
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6071
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20752
  • 1994 WL 411801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presuming prejudice from unreasonable delay “even in the 16 || absence of a showing of actual prejudice to the defendant”
  • “[T]he failure to prosecute diligently is sufficient by itself to justify 2 dismissal . . . [t]he law presumes injury from unreasonable delay.”
  • “[T]he failure to prosecute diligently is sufficient by itself to justify 2 dismissal . . . [t]he law presumes injury from unreasonable delay.”
  • “[T]he failure to prosecute diligently is sufficient by itself to justify 16 | dismissal... [t]he law presumes injury from unreasonable delay.”
  • “[T]he failure to prosecute diligently is sufficient by itself to justify 6 dismissal . . . [t]he law presumes injury from unreasonable delay.”
  • “The law presumes injury from unreasonable delay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Farris, Brunetti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.