In re William E. De Lany & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding proffered expert testimony because the plaintiff's \belated disclosure [of the expert's report wa]s not permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) [ ]\
• excluding proffered expert testimony because the plaintiff’s “belated disclosure [of the expert’s report wa]s not permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)[]”
• striking a “thinly veiled” attempt to have an initial expert report improperly couched as a rebuttal expert report to “circumvent” a failure to make timely expert disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).