In Re William and Vesta Prines, Debtors. United States Trustee v. William Prines, Iii, Vesta L. Prines, D/B/A Creative Communications

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• application of quarterly fee provisions to pending cases in the UST pilot program “does not amount to an unconstitutional taking” because debtors had no more than a unilateral expectation that Congress would not enact new fees applicable to their cases
• application of quarterly fee provisions to pending cases in the UST pilot program “does not amount to an unconstitutional taking” because debtors had no more than a unilateral expectation that Congress would not enact new fees applicable to their cases
• application of quarterly fee provisions to pending cases in the UST pilot program “does not amount to an unconstitutional taking” because debtors had no more than a unilateral expectation that Congress would not enact new fees applicable to their cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).