In Re Wilcox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the debtors’ “efforts to fund a sixty-month plan with all available disposable income, their accurate schedules, and their genuine need for chapter 13 relief outweigh the detrimental effect of their pre[-]petition conduct.”
• finding the debtors’ “efforts to fund a sixty-month plan with all available disposable income, their accurate schedules, and their genuine need for chapter 13 relief outweigh the detrimental effect of their pre[-]petition conduct.”
• finding the debtors’ “efforts to fund a sixty-month plan with all available disposable income, their accurate schedules, and their genuine need for chapter 13 relief outweigh the detrimental effect of their pre[-]petition conduct.”
• “While a chapter 13 debtor's prepetition conduct is not determinative on the issue of good faith, it is relevant to the totality of circumstances analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Daniel
  E.D. Virginia· 2001-02-27· cited 7×
• In re Roberts
  D. Kansas· 2013-06-20· cited 6×
• In re Hopper
  E.D. Arkansas· 2012-06-27· cited 5×
• In Re Faison
  E.D. Virginia· 2008-12-16· cited 3×
• In Re Stanley
  E.D. Virginia· 2002-03-18· cited 3×
• In re Torvik
  M.D. Florida· 2003-03-04