In Re White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the use of fixed expense allowances levels the playing field for debtors
• recognizing the “double deduction dilemma” created by clause (ii) and (iii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Mati
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-06-09· cited 19×
• In Re May
  S.D. Ohio· 2008-07-07· cited 12×
• In Re Young
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-08· cited 11×
• In Re Coffin
  D. Maine· 2008-11-18· cited 5×
• In Re Reinstein
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-07-28· cited 3×
• In Re Stenstrom
  C.D. Illinois· 2010-03-25· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Slusher
  D. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
• In Re Farrar-Johnson
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-09-15· cited 105×
• In Re Fowler
  D. Delaware· 2006-09-11· cited 84×
• In Re Demonica
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-07-31· cited 65×
• Ransom v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Ransom)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-27· cited 64×
• In Re Carlin
  D. Oregon· 2006-08-18· cited 49×
• In Re Swan
  N.D. California· 2007-04-18· cited 45×
• In Re Oliver
  W.D. Texas· 2006-08-08· cited 44×
• Martin G. Groder v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 1987-04-09· cited 42×
• In Re Sawdy
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2007-02-20· cited 33×
• In Re Chamberlain
  D. Arizona· 2007-04-26· cited 30×
• United States v. Hubert Michaud
  First Circuit· 1988-10-31· cited 29×
• Estate of Benjamin Shapiro, Deceased, Saul A. Shapiro, and Stephen Shapiro v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Second Circuit· 1997-04-09· cited 19×
• In Re Barrett
  S.D. Illinois· 2007-07-10· cited 15×
• Stapleton v. Talmadge (In Re Talmadge)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-06-28· cited 14×
• In Re Lindstrom
  D. Colorado· 2007-12-12· cited 11×
• In Re Moorman
  C.D. Illinois· 2007-09-28· cited 8×