In Re Whatabrands LLC v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the evidence of a prior sexual assault was admitted improperly because it served only to prove defendant’s character and to show that he acted in conformity with that character
• The court found that evidence of other sexual assaults was improperly admitted as this evidence served only to prove the defendant’s character and to show he acted in conformity with that character.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).