In re W.H. and B.H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Kentucky’s failure to adopt the proposed alternatives does not, by itself, demonstrate that the execution procedure is cruel and unusual
• holding that a pretrial detainee has at least as much protection as a prisoner
• recognizing that thirty-six states that sanction capital punishment have adopted lethal injection as the means and that thirty of those states as well as the Federal Government use the same three-drug protocol
• holding that lethal injection does not violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that lethal injection does not violate the Eighth Amendment
• holding that lethal injection does not violate the Eighth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).