In Re Wermelskirchen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the burden is on the objecting party to demonstrate 'by a preponderance of the evidence that § 1129 has not been satisfied
• noting that valuation of property was essential in considering indubitable equivalent issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).