In Re Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f a proof of claim . . . is self-sustaining (i.e., it sets forth the facts necessary to state a claim and is not self-contradictory), it is prima facie valid[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re MDC Systems, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-01-17· cited 12×
• In re Umstead
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-04-03· cited 8×
• In Re Smith
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-01-19· cited 7×
• In re Freeman
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-11-04· cited 6×
• In re Bennett
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-04-07· cited 3×
• In re Milbourne
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-09-07· cited 2×
• In re Breit
  N.D. Indiana· 2013-03-27· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor. Alan WRIGHT, Creditor-Appellee, v. Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-05-28· cited 259×
• Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-06-30· cited 41×
• Soto v. PNC Bank (In Re Soto)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-04-30· cited 35×
• In Re Sacko
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-09-17· cited 27×