In Re Wellman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a chapter 7 debtor has “[standing to object to claims ... when there is a sufficient possibility of a surplus to give the chapter 7 debtor a pecuniary interest or when the claim involved will not be discharged.”
• a chapter 7 debtor has “[standing to object to claims ... when there is a sufficient possibility of a surplus to give the chapter 7 debtor a pecuniary interest or when the claim involved will not be discharged.”
• “Furthermore, Wellman has an economic interest that would be harmed because there appears to be property of the estate under § 726(a)(6) that may be in excess of the amount necessary to pay allowed claims and administrative expenses in the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Cherne
  D. Idaho· 2014-08-07· cited 3×
• In re Brooks
  S.D. Georgia· 2016-03-30· cited 1×
• In re: Artem Koshkalda
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-12-07