In Re Welfare of Angelo H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that services offered in prior dependencies are properly considered as factual evidence in a current dependency
• stating that services offered in prior dependencies are properly considered as factual evidence in a current dependency
• theADA “does not require [the Department] to provide disabled parents with services not offered to other parents in dependency proceedings.”
• services offered in prior dependencies may properly be considered as factual evidence in a termination of parental rights proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).