S.D. New York· 10/25/1988
In Re Wedtech Corp.
Citations
- 87 B.R. 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding accounting firm’s alleged breach of contract claims to be claims for reimbursement because claims sought repayment for monies to be expended in satisfying liability to third parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tina L. Brozman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1993-05-04· cited 168×
- AL Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. Allegheny International, Inc. (In Re Allegheny International, Inc.)W.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-05-06· cited 30×
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.S.D. New York· 1992-12-18· cited 18×
- In Re Touch America Holdings, Inc.D. Delaware· 2008-01-22· cited 16×
- Bishop v. United States (In Re Leonard)D. Connecticut· 1990-03-28· cited 15×
- In Re Pacor, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-02-09· cited 15×
- In Re Amatex Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-01-29· cited 14×
- Juniper Development Group v. Kahn (In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc.)D. Massachusetts· 1989-09-13· cited 11×
- Route 21 Associates of Belleville, Inc. v. MHC, Inc.S.D. New York· 2012-12-19· cited 11×
- In Re a & H, Inc.W.D. Wisconsin· 1990-12-04· cited 10×
- In re Motors Liquidation Co.S.D. New York· 2019-03-22· cited 9×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1991-12-17· cited 8×
- Celotex Corp. v. Allstate Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.)M.D. Florida· 2003-02-10· cited 8×
- Non-Ferrous Metals (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Vantage Steel Corp. (In Re Vantage Steel Corp.)S.D. New York· 1991-04-16· cited 7×
- Juniper Development Group v. KahnFirst Circuit· 1993-05-04· cited 3×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckSeventh Circuit· 1985-01-14· cited 590×
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 437×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationSecond Circuit· 1974-10-31· cited 437×
- Computer Sciences Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-01-10· cited 366×
- Cullen v. MargiottaSecond Circuit· 1987-02-02· cited 352×
- Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1985-08-09· cited 318×
- Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal CourtSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 260×
- In Re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Debtor. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Applicant-Appellee v. Camelia Builders, Inc.Second Circuit· 1977-02-22· cited 259×
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-02-19· cited 258×
- Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanSeventh Circuit· 1982-03-26· cited 246×
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1982-06-17· cited 237×
- Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonFirst Circuit· 1986-06-10· cited 151×
- Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture CompanyNinth Circuit· 1986-12-24· cited 86×
- Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.S.D. Ohio· 1985-12-13· cited 84×
- Herzfeld v. Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & HorwathS.D. New York· 1974-05-29· cited 66×
- Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.S.D. New York· 1985-12-24· cited 65×
- Junker v. CroryFifth Circuit· 1981-07-17· cited 58×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,319 Emily Greenapple v. The Detroit Edison CompanySecond Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 54×
- Nassau County Republican Committee v. CullenSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.