In re Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is not the province of the Patent Office to determine, under • section 101, whether drugs are safe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. Finney
  Federal Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 55×
• In re Johnson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-06-16· cited 15×
• In re Jolles
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1980-07-31· cited 12×
• Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc. And Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-08-06· cited 10×
• In re Sichert
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-12-15· cited 10×
• Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2000-03-09· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. Janoski
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-01· cited 53×
• Application of Charles T. Fuetterer
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1963-06-28· cited 39×
• Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. Brandes
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1962-12-12· cited 32×
• Application of William C. Anthony
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1969-09-11· cited 19×
• Application of Frank E. Halleck
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1970-03-12· cited 12×
• In re Langer
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1974-10-03· cited 12×
• Application of Marion J. Caldwell
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1963-06-28· cited 9×
• In re Mattison
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1975-01-23· cited 7×
• Application of David J. Pye and Donald K. Peterson
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1966-02-10· cited 6×
• Application of Frederiksen
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1954-06-18· cited 2×