In Re Water Appropriation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere diversion of water into ditch does not constitute beneficial use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Central Platte Natural Resources District v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-03-25· cited 29×
• State Ex Rel. Martinez v. McDermett
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-05-19· cited 17×
• Wilkins v. State Department of Water Resources
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-12-11· cited 13×
• Blue Creek Irrigation District v. Jess
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-05-26· cited 9×
• In re Appropriation A-7603
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-08-21· cited 1×
• Harrigfeld v. NEBRASKA LIQUOR CONTROL COM'N
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1979-06-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. California
  Supreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 301×
• In Re Birdwood Irr. Dist., Water Division No. 1-A
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1951-03-23· cited 47×
• McCall v. Porter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 33×
• Carlsbad Irr. Dist. v. Ford
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1942-09-02· cited 15×
• State v. Delaware-Hickman Ditch Co.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1926-10-15· cited 10×
• North Loup River Public Power & Irrigation District v. Loup River Public Power District
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1956-02-17· cited 8×
• State v. Nielsen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1956-12-14· cited 8×