Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/21/1997
In Re Warren
Citations
- 704 A.2d 789
- 167 Vt. 259
- 1997 Vt. LEXIS 273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Sanctions are intended to protect the public from lawyers who have not properly discharged their professional duties and to maintain public confidence in the bar.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-09· cited 38×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-08-24· cited 32×
- In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-12-29· cited 17×
- In Re BlaisSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-12-19· cited 16×
- In re Strouse, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-07-15· cited 13×
- In re AndresSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-08-06· cited 13×
- In re Christena Obregon, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-03-11· cited 5×
- In re Joseph P. Palmisano, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2017-10-02· cited 3×
- In Re C. Robert Manby, Jr., Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2023-08-04· cited 3×
- In re PopeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-08-01· cited 2×
- People v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-08-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.