Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/27/2014
In re Wangler
Citations
- 305 Mich. App. 438
- 853 N.W.2d 402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the respondent’s challenge to the trial court’s exercise of jurisdiction—based on the fact that a written plea was allegedly invalid and the fact that the respondent was not present at the adjudication trial—was collateral, and therefore precluded
- concluding the question of whether obligor’s spousal support should be modified upon retirement “must be made in a modification action when retirement is imminent or has actually occurred”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gleicher, Hoekstra, Sawyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re KanjiaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-30· cited 37×
- In re WanglerMichigan Supreme Court· 2015-11-06· cited 11×
- in Re S Kanjia MinorMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-10-21
- in Re S Kanjia MinorMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-30
- in Re wangler/paschke MinorsMichigan Supreme Court· 2015-11-06
- In Re the Marriage of Robert M. Hayden and Jean Haskell Upon the Petition of Robert M. Hayden, and Concerning Jean HaskellCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-12-23
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re VanDalenMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-06-16· cited 552×
- In Re HatcherMichigan Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 114×
- In Re SLH, AJH, & VAHMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-24· cited 91×
- In Re GazellaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-02-16· cited 76×
- In re DMKMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-07-15· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.