Skip to main content

In re Wangler

Citations

  • 305 Mich. App. 438
  • 853 N.W.2d 402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the respondent’s challenge to the trial court’s exercise of jurisdiction—based on the fact that a written plea was allegedly invalid and the fact that the respondent was not present at the adjudication trial—was collateral, and therefore precluded
  • concluding the question of whether obligor’s spousal support should be modified upon retirement “must be made in a modification action when retirement is imminent or has actually occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gleicher, Hoekstra, Sawyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.