Skip to main content
· 12/1/1980

In re Walter Straus & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 449 U.S. 1012
  • 101 S. Ct. 569
  • 66 L. Ed. 2d 470
  • 49 U.S.L.W. 3409
  • 1980 U.S. LEXIS 4114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing and approving of this “inverse relationship between fund and fee”
  • starting with range of 25%-30% and awarding roughly 32% of fund after noting the skill and efficiency of counsel
  • court should employ percentage approach in common fund cases so long as there “are no circumstances suggesting its application would be unjust”
  • “in order to avoid allowing the kind of -windfall fee awards which depressed support for the percentage of recovery method in the first place,” court finds that a similar result would also have resulted under lodestar approach
  • listing ranges of percentages found by other courts and commentators
  • court finds expenses adequately documented, proper, and reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.