· 12/1/1980
In re Walter Straus & Son, Inc.
Citations
- 449 U.S. 1012
- 101 S. Ct. 569
- 66 L. Ed. 2d 470
- 49 U.S.L.W. 3409
- 1980 U.S. LEXIS 4114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing and approving of this “inverse relationship between fund and fee”
- starting with range of 25%-30% and awarding roughly 32% of fund after noting the skill and efficiency of counsel
- court should employ percentage approach in common fund cases so long as there “are no circumstances suggesting its application would be unjust”
- “in order to avoid allowing the kind of -windfall fee awards which depressed support for the percentage of recovery method in the first place,” court finds that a similar result would also have resulted under lodestar approach
- listing ranges of percentages found by other courts and commentators
- court finds expenses adequately documented, proper, and reasonable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.