Skip to main content
· 7/30/1996

In re Waldren

Citations

  • 343 N.C. 751
  • 473 S.E.2d 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[b]ecause a person qualified to bind [the company] signed a document that contained precisely the language required by § 605(c)(1) [of the CDA], that document was a valid certification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.