In Re Walat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Efficiency is a purpose that is consistent with the letter and spirit of the bankruptcy laws.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Industrial Financial Corp. v. Falk (In Re Falk)
  D. Minnesota· 1989-02-08· cited 22×
• In Re Russell
  E.D. Virginia· 2010-06-30· cited 15×
• Beskin v. Maupin (In Re Maupin)
  W.D. Virginia· 2007-11-01· cited 14×
• In Re Madera
  D. South Carolina· 2011-03-01· cited 8×
• In Re Webster
  E.D. Virginia· 1994-03-10· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hanna v. Plumer
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
• In the Matter of Martin M. Decker and Kathleen H. Decker, Individually and Jointly, Bankrupts. Appeal of Martin M. Decker
  Third Circuit· 1979-03-26· cited 105×
• In Re Moses Hill, Debtor. Phelix Jones, Creditors v. Moses Hill, Debtor
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-22· cited 99×
• In the Matter of Ray Bryan ADAMS, Jr., Bankrupt. Z.D. BONNER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray Bryan ADAMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-06-25· cited 73×
• ASSOCIATED DRY GOODS CORPORATION, Appellee, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Appellant
  Fourth Circuit· 1983-11-01· cited 14×
• In Re Walat
  E.D. Virginia· 1988-06-03· cited 9×