In Re Wagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the context of Prof.Cond.R. 4.1(a) relating to false statements of material fact to third parties
• The Respondent asserted that he engaged in the conduct at request of his client. The Court found that the Respondent violated rule 4.4. The Court found that ‘purely opportunistic acts such as those taken by the [Respondent will not be tolerated.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Royer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 3×
• In Re Allen
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-10-18· cited 2×
• In the Matter of Kenneth J. Allen
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-09-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Holscher
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-05-15· cited 41×
• In Re Siegel
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-04-14· cited 19×
• In Re McCord
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-01-28· cited 3×
• In the Matter of Goebel
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 1×