Skip to main content
· 12/16/2015

in Re: VSDH Vaquero Venture, Ltd. and Douglas M. Hickok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant's - 16 - statement that he did not recall having seen a check register page was intended to deceive FBI agents
  • explaining that 4 the completeness and accuracy of “a responsive statement must be judged according to common 5 sense standards”
  • upholding district court’s imposing heightened criminal sentence to send signal “that we will hold our attorneys to a higher standard”
  • affirming conviction where a federal agent testified to an exchange with the defendant
  • “Indeed, the primary purpose of § 3553(a)(6) is to reduce unwarranted sentence disparities on a nationwide level.”
  • “Indeed, the primary purpose of § 3553(a)(6) is to reduce unwarranted sentence disparities on a nationwide level.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.