In Re VistaCare Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to obtain permission from the appointing court means that “no other court would have jurisdiction to hear the suit.”
• holding that the Barton doctrine extends to lawsuits against a bankruptcy trustee for acts done in the trustee’s official capacity
• holding that the Barton doctrine continued to apply to actions against a trustee in bankruptcy and that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in allowing a garnishment action to proceed in that case
• holding that \the Barton doctrine continues to apply to bankruptcy trustees\
• noting that movant provided testimony during lift stay hearing
• discussing the appointing bankruptcy court as \uniquely situated to determine whether a claim against the trustee has merit... [and] uniquely situated to determine the potential effect of a judgment against the trustee.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).