Skip to main content
· 5/22/1989

In Re Victoria Station Incorporated, Debtor. Willamette Waterfront, Ltd. v. Victoria Station Incorporated, and Jerry W. Marlow, Esq.

Citations

  • 875 F.2d 1380
  • 21 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 483
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7047
  • 19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1090
  • 1989 WL 52676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Section 365(d)(4) ... simply does not speak to the ability of a debtor to move for a second extension of time subsequent to the first 60-day period but within the extended period of time provided for assumption or rejection.\
  • “Section 365(d)(4) ... simply does not speak to the ability of a debtor to move for a second extension of time subsequent to the first 60-day period but within the extended period of time provided for assumption or rejection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Hall, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.