In Re Van Ness Auto Plaza, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is not beyond the realm of reasonable decisions” for a manufacturer to refuse to accept a dealer with below average C S I
• “[W]ithholding consent to assignment is reasonable only if it is based on factors closely related to the proposed assignee’s likelihood of successful performance under the franchise agreement.”
• “[W]ithholding consent to assignment is reasonable only if it is based on factors closely related to the proposed assignee’s likelihood of successful performance under the franchise agreement.”
• “This test [of reasonableness] is . . . . an objective test that requires that the [manufacturer’s] decision be supported by evidence.”
• “This test [of reasonableness] is.... an objective test that requires that the [manufacturer’s] decision be supported by evidence.”
• “The reasons stated by Porsche for withholding consent were not pretexts to mask other reasons for withholding consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).